Monday, December 24, 2012

Year One. Day Twenty-Four: "A Christmas Carol" (1951)

Day Twenty-Four of my Advent Christmas Carol Challenge:

"A Christmas Carol" (1951)

It's Christmas Eve and the final day of my challenge, which means it's time for the daddy of them all. The Alastair Sim version of the novella, which is regarded by pretty much everybody as the greatest adaptation of them all.

With good reason too. Alastair Sim IS Ebenezer Scrooge here. His portrayal of the old miser is a complex one, at first hideous and proudly arrogant, then slowly growing shameful of his ways and surprised to discover that he still has a heart.

The supporting cast of character actors are uniformly excellent, and even though some of them are a little hammy (Jacob Marley...) this only adds to charm of this very traditional, theatrical adaptation.

The film is extremely faithful to the book, but more importantly, it is made with such a great affection for it that is missing from so many of the half-arsed versions that have come after it.

Talking of later productions, it is interesting to see just how influential this version became. So much of the imagery of the tale, from Scrooge's counting house, to his bedroom, to the reformed miser throwing open the window of his house, look the way they do because this film depicted them so.

Of course, Scrooge's redemption is the highlight of the film. Sim plays it with such abandon, it is inconceivable that this is the same man who we began this story with.

The finest production of what is easily the greatest story ever written.

As festive as Christmas Day itself.

"A Christmas Carol" (1951) 5/5


GOD BLESS US EVERYONE!

Sunday, December 23, 2012

Year One. Day Twenty-Three: "A Christmas Carol" (1910)

Day Twenty-Three of my Advent Christmas Carol Challenge:

"A Christmas Carol" (1910)

This silent film adaptation of the novella is believed to be the earliest surviving film version ever made, (although two were made before, both are thought to have been lost.)

It is an interesting prospect to watch a silent version of the story. So much of the spirit of the adaptations I have seen so far depend upon the unforgettable dialogue to capture the spirit of Dickens' work.

Marc McDermott plays Scrooge - a once staggeringly prolific Australian actor who would go on to feature in over 180 films. It's hard and perhaps unfair to judge his performance, as silent film acting is so different to acting nowadays. However, he was very popular during his career so presumably he was doing something right.

The film utilises some very early special effects for the ghosts, which was surprising and very welcome to see, and the version I watched had some enjoyably jaunty music to accompany it.

The film runs at a breakneck 10 minutes, meaning that there's no chance for any real depth to the tale. However, it is clear that this adaptation was not really meant to tell the story, as it is far too brief to properly explain it; it is more a way of filming the novella for those who already knew it (who, much like today, would have been most people.)

While it has nothing to offer that other versions did not do better, it is still an irresistible viewing experience to see a film that is over a hundred years old, and for that reason it is more of a historical curio than a classic version of the story.
As quiet as a Silent Night.
"A Christmas Carol" (1910) 3/5

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Year One. Day Twenty-Two: "Mickey's Christmas Carol" (1983)

Day Twenty-Two of my Advent Christmas Carol Challenge:

"Mickey's Christmas Carol" (1983)

This made for video version of the classic tale is something of an ensemble piece. While Scrooge McDuck (who else) is our Ebenezer, he is joined by virtually every Disney character you could imagine (circa 1983)

I've never had much time for Mickey Mouse, finding him a tiresome character with no personality, so I was rather pleased to find out that despite the title, he plays only a secondary role in this story, as Bob Cratchit. With Pluto, Jimminy Cricket and others being given more screen time.

As with everything that comes from Disney, there is a certain slickness of production which was missing from all other animated versions I have seen so far, (except perhaps the 2009 version, which was so slick as to be inhuman) and the animation is charming and detailed.

However, at a miniscule 21 minutes, it has to race through the story at such a speed that it never has time to pause for breath. It does not help either that almost half of the running time is taken up by the time before the first ghost appears.

This version has none of the broad appeal of the House of Mouse's finest works and ultimately feels only worth recommending to Disney completists.

As brief as a jig at the Fezziwig's Christmas party.

"Mickey's Christmas Carol" (1983) 2/5

Friday, December 21, 2012

Year One. Day Twenty-One: "Scrooge" (1935)

Day Twenty-One of my Advent Christmas Carol Challenge:

"Scrooge" (1935)

After adaptations featuring the Smurfs, the Muppets and the Flintstones over the previous few days, it was quite an enjoyable change to return to another traditional version of the tale.

This 1935 British version is the earliest film of the story made with sound. It stars Seymour Hicks in the lead role - an actor who has now become almost forgotten, but was once one of the most famous actors in the country.

Decent prints of this movie seem to have been lost to time, but the grainy, saturated image in the version I found seemed to work somewhat in its favour. The streets of London have never looked more miserable or quite so bleak, and at times, the figures shuffling about the place looked like little more than shadows. How much of this was artistic intention rather than a product of a diminished print is anyone's guess, but I rather appreciated it.

Hicks is a rather peculiar Scrooge. Perhaps it is thanks to later versions of the film that we now have such a firm grasp upon how Scrooge must look and act, because in this version he is almost a vagabond. Scruffy of hair, dishevelled of clothes whilst shuffling around the streets looking like Lon Chaney's Phantom of the Opera.

If this film is remembered at all, it is often only thanks to the very unusual decision to not show us many of the ghosts. Marley is invisible, the Ghost of Christmas past is always off screen and Christmas Yet to Come is only the shadow of a finger. Only Christmas Present is seen in full (though not for long.)

The absence of these ghosts is greatly missed, as is the huge swathes of the story this version omits, including the entirety of Scrooge's childhood (and a great deal of his present.)

There is a sense of melancholy to the film that sets it apart from the others and the score and visuals help set the mood. But a lacklustre central performance and too many liberties taken with the source material mean that there is very little here worth recommending.

As bleak as a midwinter when frosty winds made moan.

"Scrooge" (1935) 2/5

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Year One. Day Twenty: "The Smurfs Christmas Carol" (2011)

Day Twenty of my Advent Christmas Carol Challenge:

"The Smurfs Christmas Carol" (2011)

Further proof, if it were even needed that "A Christmas Carol" is the worlds most elastic story - in that it can be stretched into any form conceivable, comes in the form of this direct-to-DVD Christmas special.

I was never much of a fan of the Smurfs. There was nothing about them I ever found particularly loathsome, they simply never captivated me as a child. However, I was somewhat intrigued to see how this version would play out nonetheless, as at only 22 minutes, it is the shortest adaptation I have seen so far.

Grouchy Smurf is the only Smurf in town who refuses to make merry on Christmas Eve, much to the ire of the rest of the Smurfs.

With the help of some ghost-poisoned tea (yes, that is correct) Grouchy is spirited away from his computer generated 3D home, to a traditional 2D cell animation version.

From then on it's business as usual, with three ghosts showing him the error of his ways, with a few digressions, including a lot of nonsense involving hats and ending with the total destruction of the Smurf Village.

The problem with adaptations of this story that are set within the continuity of a running series, is that characters are never really allowed to change too much, therefore their redemption can't be too grand and their miserly ways can't be too awful. This is precisely the case here.

Grouchy Smurf is mildly reformed by the end of the story, but not so much that the next time we see him, he will be in any way changed.

The animation, especially the cell animation, is charming and the voice acting is fine, but it's impossible to get too excited about a version such as this, in which every effort seems to have been made to ensure that it never becomes anything greater than mediocre.

As uneventful and forgettable as Christmas day with Jacob Marley.

"The Smurfs Christmas Carol" (2011) 2/5

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Year One. Day Nineteen: "A Flintstones Christmas Carol" (1994)

Day Nineteen of my Advent Christmas Carol Challenge:

"A Flintstones Christmas Carol" (1994)

My first thought upon hearing about this adaptation of the story was, why are The Flintstones staging an adaptation of a book written in the 19th century? Of course, I was then struck with the question of why the modern stone age family were celebrating Christmas at all...

Anachronisms aside (and seriously, the Flintstones features dinosaurs, so I wasn't expecting rigorous prehistoric accuracy,) this version takes the "play-within-a-play" format, that has been borrowed/stolen from Mr. Magoo. However, it works quite nicely in its own right.

The story follows the fortunes of Fred Flintstone, who has been cast in the role of Scrooge for Bedrock's annual Christmas play.

So obsessed is he with perfecting his role, he grows selfish and arrogant. Throughout the course of the play, Fred learns the true meaning of the story and how he should stop being so mean.

The cartoon is light and cute. The animation itself is Hannah-Barbera, so there's obviously a certain lifelessness to it all, but yet again, I found myself taken aback by the faithfulness it demonstrated towards its source material.


Aside from using most of the dialogue, the costumes appear to be based upon the original illustrations. It's always nice to notice these details, as it suggests that this was a version made with deep affection for the original story.

On top of that, we have concepts that very few child-orientated animations would deal with today, including death and poverty, which are played exactly as Dickens intended - utterly seriously. Most surprisingly of all comes a subplot featuring allegations of infidelity, which helped remind me just why The Flintstones was noted for having such wide appeal to the whole family.

As merry making as Bob Cratchit's Christmas day.



"A Flintstones Christmas Carol" (1994) 3/5

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

Year One. Day Eighteen: "The Muppet Christmas Carol" (1992)

Day Eighteen of my Advent Christmas Carol Challenge:

"The Muppet Christmas Carol" (1992)

In the interests of full disclosure, I must confess that this is the only version of the story I have seen before - however, that was many years ago and my memory of it was in need of a refresher.

For many, this adaptation of "A Christmas Carol" is regarded not just as one of the greatest Muppet movies, but one of the finest versions of the story ever made.

Michael Caine is on Scrooge duties for this film, and while he's an actor I have never been especially fond, his understated performance in the role is one of the many highlights of the film.

A handful of other humans litter the charmingly made Victorian London streets, but this film rightly knows that it's the Muppets we are here to see, with all the favourites playing the classic roles, Kermit as Bob Cratchit, Miss. Piggy as his wife and Fozzie as Mr. Fozziwig (!) among others.

There are a few songs scattered around the place, most of which are very nice, if a little forgettable and none come close to the almost operatic excesses of the near perfect "The Great Muppet Caper"

A welcome addition to the story is Gonzo playing the role of Dickens himself, which works as a means to have the great man narrating his own tale, while having to scale walls, slide down chimneys and fly over the rooftops of London in order to keep up with the action of the story.

This means that the script remains incredibly faithful to the original version, including oft forgotten details such as The Ghost of Christmas Present aging (and eventually dying) throughout the course of the evening.

It also allows for some lovely dedications to Dickens himself, my favourite being him sitting on a shelf beside the busts of the greatest authors in the history of the world.

As lovingly crafted as a Christmas dinner with all the trimmings.

"The Muppet Christmas Carol" (1992) 4/5